우선 이번 포스팅은 코리안으로 하겠다.
오늘 science 잡지에 "re-replication may be a contributor to gene copy number changes" 라는 제목으로 논문이 실렸다. 그 메커니즘은 오른쪽과 같다. NAHR(non-allelic homologous recombination)에 의해 gene copy number 가 달라진다는 내용인듯하다 (그림만 보고 읽진 않았다). 이 그림을 보고 NAHR이 무엇인가를 찾아보게 되었다. 다름 아니라 하나의 allele에서 일어나는 HR(homologous recombination).
그렇다면 HR은 무엇인가? recombination은 재조합으로 예전 생물학 시간에 들었던 것이 얼핏 기억이 난다. 우선 두군데에서 정보를 찾았다.
sanger 와 wikipedia.
생거에서 말하는 정보는 매우 적고 좀더 자세히나온 위키 피디아를 본다.핵심 적인 내용(왼쪽 그림)은 double strand break repairs 과정의 하나의 pathway인 DSBR pathway에 의해 HR이 생기고 그 결과 crossover 내지는 gene conversion이 생긴다는 것이다.
double Holliday junctions이 nicking endonuclease에 의해 horizontal resolution(sanger site에서의 표현을 빌리자면) 에 의하면 gene conversion이 일어나고 vertical resolution에 의해 cross-over가 일어난다.
문제는 일반적으로 gene conversion을 찾아보면 그림이 오른쪽과 같은데 위의 과정에는 gene conversion이 일어나면 한쪽 duplex에는 다른 한쪽의 duplex에서 온 dna 조각이 double strand로 통으로 들어가는게 맞지만 gene conversion이 일어나지 않은 duplex에도 one strand로 다른 쪽의 dna 조각이 들어가게 되는데 오른쪽의 그림에서는 한쪽은 전혀 dna 가닥이 섞이지 않게 표현되어 있다. 이는 내가 잘못 이해한것인가 아니면 편의상 그림을 오른쪽과 같이 그린것인가?
anyone can answer this problem????
Monday, August 23, 2010
darwin's evolution theory
Several months ago, I was fascinated with evolution theory. So I found many documents and web sites for a week and tried to read most of them. But because whether my limitation on interpreting or lack of detailed explanation, my understanding to evolution theory is not clear at that time.
I found this book on last week by chance and read it on last weekend. Through this book I can do arrange my thinking about evolution theory and its' history.
Especially a section which was written by Motoo Kimura thirty years ago who make neutral theory of molecular evolution was really impressive. I read that part as if I heard lecture from Kimura.
I believe that ALL analysis of biological data is based on evolution theory and the biologists who don't have this concept are scientists without spirit.
As mentioned in Darwin 2.0 (the book? which is written by professor in Ewha univ.), Darwin's theory is the one which can be considered as the greatest theory in biology and it's greatness can be comparable with theory of relativity from physics.
I can found theory about evolution and meaning of population genetics and application of evolution. Of course although these are not that concrete, it's enough to set the basic concept of these things.
I found this book on last week by chance and read it on last weekend. Through this book I can do arrange my thinking about evolution theory and its' history.
Especially a section which was written by Motoo Kimura thirty years ago who make neutral theory of molecular evolution was really impressive. I read that part as if I heard lecture from Kimura.
I believe that ALL analysis of biological data is based on evolution theory and the biologists who don't have this concept are scientists without spirit.
As mentioned in Darwin 2.0 (the book? which is written by professor in Ewha univ.), Darwin's theory is the one which can be considered as the greatest theory in biology and it's greatness can be comparable with theory of relativity from physics.
I can found theory about evolution and meaning of population genetics and application of evolution. Of course although these are not that concrete, it's enough to set the basic concept of these things.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)